By Candice Nguyen
Voices
At the end of 2009, AAJA’s national office was left with a $207,000 deficit.
That loss created a sense of financial emergency, pushing officials to ask for help from individual chapters with suggested donations as high as $12,000. Some have balked at the quota, while others are giving more. Donation amounts were not arbitrary, said AAJA National President Sharon Chan.
“We assessed the individual chapters’ accounts to calculate how much they’d be able to contribute,” Chan said. National officials worked with accountants to create a formula that figured out each chapter’s share.
The formula took a chapter’s bank account divided by the sum of all the accounts. Then it multiplied that fraction by the fundraising goal, which according to Chan, is $115,000. Membership numbers also were taken into account. Larger chapters with bigger budgets paid more while those with less paid a smaller amount. A payment plan was available for those chapters who couldn’t pay outright, said National Treasurer Candace Heckman.
Heckman said she’s not able to release exact figures of total chapter contributions so far until today’s treasurers’ meeting.
“In the end, all the chapters understood the mission and paid that formula that we came up with because, in the end, all of our money is together anyways,” Heckman said.
Chapters have pledged a total of $79,380. More financially stable groups, such as Sacramento and Atlanta, supported this fundraising method.
“We didn’t have a problem with paying,” said Vino Wong, Atlanta Chapter president. “Nonetheless, it’s about unity. If the mother ship sinks, we all sink.”
Earlier this year, AAJA National asked the Sacramento chapter for a $25,000 donation, which Sacramento delivered. Judy Lin, the chapter’s copresident, said it only initially wanted to donate about $10,000, but decided to donate the asked amount instead.
The chapter’s 25th anniversary is in 2010. Yesterday, the Sacramento chapter was awarded AAJA Chapter of the Year. It was the second chapter, after Minnesota, to donate funds through their “Issue Challenge.” Sacramento Chapter Co-President Pamela Wu says, “Our chapter was financially healthy. Then again, our members didn’t have to just reach into their pockets, they could seek sponsorships to help our chapter.”
At the same time, other chapters met the request with confusion and concern.
“It was more of a mandate, not a choice,” said Jeffrey Ong, Arizona chapter co-president. “I disagree with the usage of the word ‘donation,’ and I expressed that. It wasn’t a donation because a donation is a willing donat on to a cause. This was an assessment, from our viewpoint. I just wish it was a little more straightforward.”
The New York Chapter is scheduled to pay $12,626 to AAJA National, a large sum compared to most other chapters. At New York’s board meeting last May, members discussed pitching to AAJA National the idea of being given the bid as host of a future convention once they pay the amount.
Two years ago, New York lost a bid to host the 2011 convention to Detroit.
“We would love to have the AAJA convention in New York, but we’re not using our payment as a bargaining chip,” says Sital Patel, New York chapter president. “It was just part of the larger discussion.”
On all levels, 2009 hit AAJA hard. However, Chan reassures members: “This is a one-time thing. This was an SOS during the worst time for our organization.”
Find Candice on Twitter @candinguyen
Employment opportunities are improving say these covention attendees: Job seekers Jeremy Lee and Caron Alarab, and recruiters Diane Parker of Associated Press and Virgil L. Smith, vice president of Talent Management, talk about the convention’s job fair.
By Peter Sessum
Voices
Desperation is in the air. With so many people scrambling for so few jobs, AAJA’s annual job fair can take on the scrappy intensity of a dog fight. To help job seekers cope, Voices cornered some of the convention’s top recruiters to glean some words of wisdom:
People rarely get actual jobs at job fairs, says LA Times recruiter Randy Hagihara. Job seekers should treat it more like a conversation than a formal interview. Recruiters talk to many, but remember few.
You often just get 10 seconds to make a good, lasting impression. Start with a good, firm handshake and look them in the eye. Holding eye contact is good; staring is creepy. And don’t forget to blink.
Know the organization before talking to its recruiter and have some questions ready. Smart questions engage recruiters. And in this environment there is such a thing as a stupid question. Asking about the future strategy of the company is good; asking where San Jose is will terminate the conversation.
You want to have a digital footprint, says über-recruiter and convention veteran Joe Grimm. Have a blog, a resume on LinkedIn, be on FaceBook and Twitter. Many recruiters look up candidates on social media. If your name comes up empty on Google, so will your job search.
Demonstrate your copy-edit skills by writing your resume in AP style. Include descriptions of previous job experience not just bullet points. Edit out unnecessary words. Distinguishing between cell or land-line phone is good, but label your phone number and e-mail. If a recruiter can’t figure out which is which on their own, do you really want to work for them?
Meet other professionals at dinner; don’t just sit with your friends. And be professional even outside the convention. “The person you talked to today will see you acting like an idiot on Hollywood Boulevard,” Grimm says.
Once you have talked to everyone who can help you, pop back in and chat again. Revisiting a recruiter will reinforce their memory of you, and in the end, people hire people they remember. And send a thank you note. E-mail is fine, but even better is a hand written note with something personal. ‘Thank you for telling me about the opportunity in Chesapeake Bay” is specific and will help you be remembered.
Remember job seekers aren’t just competing for the best jobs, recruiters are also competing for the best candidates.
Find Peter on Twitter @petersessum
By Dominique Fong
Voices
In April, AAJA adopted a new fundraising policy that has allowed the organization to accept money from nontraditional companies, a decision that has surfaced concerns about possible conflicts of interest.
Historically, AAJA accepted money from strictly media-related companies. Now, the organization can accept money from corporations and government organizations.
The change had some worried that the sponsorship would compromise an AAJA member’s ability to write a balanced article on the sponsor.
Representatives from sponsors Toyota and Google were present at this year’s convention. The U.S. Census Bureau tabled a booth at the career fair, in addition to traditional media companies such as The Wall Street Journal and The McClatchy Company.
The ethical issue is one that journalists may never agree on, national AAJA treasurer Candace Heckman said.
All donations, however, are still subject to the approval of the governing board.
That, Heckman said, makes the new policy clearer than a former version that allowed companies such as alcohol distributors to donate without restriction.
Convention attendees expressed mixed reactions.
“It’s good that the organization has relaxed its rules to help funding,” said Will Chang, a member of the New York chapter.
Conning Chu, a member of the Los Angeles chapter, said sponsorships from nontraditional companies should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
“I think it depends on the company and what the money’s being used for,” Chu said. “Being a nonprofit, I don’t think it’s a conflict of interest, like if the money is being used for things like scholarships.”
AAJA also redefined the term “media company” to accept money from companies such as Microsoft, which owns MSNBC, and Google, which has websites such as Blogspot and YouTube.
Facing the recession and decreasing donations from traditional media companies, other UNITY organizations have had to implement similar policies to balance their budgets.
The policy is a matter of survival, said Russell Contreras, financial officer for the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
“We have to still keep the doors open to provide services for the association to grow,” Contreras said.
Contreras said he is aggressively targeting companies that appeal to Latin American and Hispanic communities, such as soccer teams. Contreras has also pursued sponsorships from the Noche Latina campaign, which markets merchandise with word plays on NBA team names, such as “Los Lakers” and “Los Kobe.”
The National Association of Black Journalists has also focused on sports-related companies, this year raising more than $100,000 from the NFL , MLB and the NBA Players Association, among others.
The disparity between revenue from traditional and nontraditional sponsorships is like “night and day,” said Gregory Lee, national NABJ treasurer.
On the issue of ethics, Lee said the relationship between donor and journalist is too indirect to influence the commitment to objectivity.
“I’m not individually accepting money,” said Lee, who is also the senior assistant sports editor at The Boston Globe. “We accept the money as a group. It doesn’t compromise my ability to report a fair story.”
Find Dominique on Twitter @dominiquefong. Voices staff writer Elizabeth Gyori contributed.
Search Voices: